Board of Commissioners
Meeting Minutes
       
Back to Boards & Commissions

 


Board of Commissioners Meeting Minutes
Board of Commissioners Meeting - March 10, 2005

.

Board of Commissioners Meeting                                                         March 10, 2005

 

The stated meeting of the Board of Commissioners of the Township of Abington was held on Thursday, March 10, 2005 at the Township Administration Building , Abington , PA. , with Commissioner Gross presiding.

 

CALL TO ORDER:              8:00 p.m.

 

ROLL CALL:                        Present: Commissioners AGOSTINE, MYERS,

                                                WACHTER, DIJOSEPH, TURCO, ZAPPONE,

                                                CARLIN, O’CONNOR, LUKER, MCGRATH,

                                                LYNOTT, GILLESPIE, RING, GROSS

                                                Excused: WEILHEIMER

 

                                                Township Manager CONWAY

                                                Assistant Township Manager LAHAZA

                                                Chief of Police KELLY

                                                Township Engineer POWERS

                                                Finance Director MATIZA

                                                Director of Parks & Recreation WENDELL

                                                Director of Code Enforcement MATTEO

                                                Planning & Zoning Official PENECALE

                                                Director of Public Works MICCIOLO

                                                Superintendent of W.W.T. P. LEBER

 

PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE

 

ANNOUNCEMENT:

 

Commissioner Gross announced that an Executive Session was held on Wednesday, March 2, 2005 to discuss potential Real Estate acquisition.

 

APPROVAL OF MINUTES:

 

Commissioner Ring made a MOTION, seconded by Commissioner Carlin to approve the minutes of the Board of Commissioners meeting of February 10, 2005.

 

MOTION was ADOPTED 14-0.

 

PUBLIC WORKS COMMITTEE:

 

 

 

 

 

 

Board of Commissioners Meeting                                                         March 10, 2005

 

 

PUBLIC HEARING – Ordinance No. 1923 - $10,800,000 in Non-Electoral Debt of General Obligation Bonds – Series 2005

 

Commissioner Gross made a MOTION, seconded by Commissioner Wachter to adopt Ordinance No. 1923 - $10,800,000 in Non-Electoral Debt of General Obligation Bonds –Series 2005.

 

Mr. Conway stated this public hearing is for the proposed $10.8 million Bond Ordinance to fund the following capital projects:

 

  • $3.46 million for drainage improvements at 22 locations throughout the Township.

 

  • $6.6 million for replacement of old sewer lines in the Ardsley area.

 

  • $740,000 for the Township’s 20% match for County Open Space Grant ($2.955 million).

 

The municipal and sewer projects will be funded over ten years and fifteen years respectively.

 

Commissioner Gross asked for any public comments in favor of this ordinance. There were none.

 

Commissioner Gross asked for any public comments in disfavor of this ordinance. There were none.

 

Commissioner Gross asked for any comments from the Commissioners.

 

Commissioner Wachter commented Abington Township hires a special consultant, bond counsel, and public bids are taken as compared to the way certain large cities handles these matters. He appreciates how it is handled in our Township.

 

Ms. Matiza stated Rick Troncelliti, our Bond Counsel member is present this evening.

 

Manrico Troncelliti, Attorney of McTighe, Weiss, O’Rourke, Troncelliti & Morgan, P.C. 11 East Airy Street, Norristown , PA., stated this ordinance authorizes the incurring of debt of $10.8 million. The debt will be purchased in its entirety by the selected underwriter PNC Capital Markets. They will present a purchase contract to the Township for a signature, if the ordinance is adopted, authorizing the purchase of bonds for $10,749,505.60, which represents 99.53% of the par value or face value of the bonds. It concludes an underwriter discount of $42,660, and original issue discount of $7,834.40.

 

Board of Commissioners Meeting                                                         March 10, 2005

 

 

The total interest of the life of the bonds, which is 13 years, is $4,699,571.48, and the net interest rates on those bonds are 4.162%.

 

Commissioner Turco asked when are the bonds callable?

 

Mr. Troncelliti replied there is a five-year call period on these bonds. Anytime after April 15, 2010 they may be called in the event that is advantageous to refinance them or pay them off.

 

Commissioner Gross made a MOTION, seconded by Commissioner Agostine to close the Public Hearing.

 

MOTION was ADOPTED 14-0. The Hearing was closed at 8:05 p.m.

 

Roll Call vote resulted in motion being unanimously passed 14-0.

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Ordinance 1923

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Board of Commissioners Meeting                                                         March 10, 2005

 

Bid Award for Ready Mix Concrete

 

Commissioner Wachter made a MOTION, seconded by Commissioner Zappone to reject all bids.

 

MOTION was ADOPTED 14-0.

 

Bid Award for Bituminous Concrete (Black Top)

 

Commissioner Wachter made a MOTION, seconded by Commissioner Zappone to enter into a contract with Hanson Aggregates BMC, the lowest responsible bidder for Part I in the amount of $484,750.00 and Part II in the amount of $20,970.00, as per bid specifications.

 

MOTION was ADOPTED 14-0.

 

Grant Application – Composting Infrastructure Development Grant

 

Commissioner Wachter made a MOTION, seconded by Commissioner Zappone to authorize proper Township officials to apply for a Composting Infrastructure Development Grant in the amount of $75,000.00 for composting equipment.

 

MOTION was ADOPTED 14-0.

 

Disposition/Destruction of Township Records

 

Commissioner Wachter made a MOTION, seconded by Commissioner Zappone to authorize the disposal/destruction of Township Records (see attached) stored in the Highway Yard building over the lunch room.

 

MOTION was ADOPTED 14-0.

 

Engineering Proposal

 

Commissioner Wachter made a MOTION, seconded by Commissioner Zappone to accept the proposal from BCM Engineers at a fee not to exceed $130,250.00; from Carrol Engineers at a fee not to exceed $75,606.00; and from Gilmore Engineers at a fee not to exceed $111,313.50; to be funded from Fund Balance that will be reimbursed from 2005 Bond Issue.

 

MOTION was ADOPTED 14-0.

 

 

 

Board of Commissioners Meeting                                                         March 10, 2005

 

 

2005 Road Overlay Program

 

Commissioner Wachter made a MOTION, seconded by Commissioner Zappone to approve the 2005 Road Overlay Program for the streets listed in the attached document and to supplement Highway Aid Funding with $70,000 from Fund Balance.

 

MOTION was ADOPTED 14-0.

 

Bid Award, Contract 129 – Anaerobic Digester Upgrade

 

Commissioner Wachter made a MOTION, seconded by Commissioner Zappone to accept the lowest responsible bid and enter into an agreement with Klipper Construction Associates, Inc. for work under Contract 129 in the amount of $1,434,000.00 and to allocate $584,705.00 from Sewer Operating Fund Retained Earnings to fund Contract 129. The remainder is to be funded as follows: $338,738.00 from Sewer Operating Account #02-00-000-7351, transfer $134,450.00 from 2002 Bond Issue Collection System Evaluation to 2002 Bond Issue Digester Cover project and apply $510,557.00 from the 2002 Bond Issue.

 

MOTION was ADOPTED 14-0.

 

Engineering Design and Contract Management – Anaerobic Digester Upgrade

 

Commissioner Wachter made a MOTION, seconded by Commissioner Zappone to authorize CET Engineering to provide construction management services at engineering costs in the amount of $41,289.57, to be funded from Sewer Operating Retained Earnings.

 

MOTION was ADOPTED 14-0.

 

Resolution No. 05-006 – (DCED) Department of Community and Economic Development

 

Commissioner Wachter made a MOTION, seconded by Commissioner Zappone to approve Resolution No. 05-006 authorizing Abington Township as applicant to buy one (1) house with funds from DCED.

 

MOTION was ADOPTED 14-0.

 

 

 

 

 

Resolution 05-006

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Board of Commissioners Meeting                                                         March 10, 2005

 

 

CODE ENFORCEMENT AND LAND DEVELOPMENT COMMITTEE:

 

Public Hearing – Ordinance No. 1920 – An Ordinance to amend the zoning ordinance of the Township of Abington , by establishing the NR Neighborhood Residential District.

 

Commissioner Agostine stated a public hearing has been advertised for Ordinances 1920 and 1921. Since the advertisement appeared and the Montgomery County Planning Commission reviewed the proposed ordinances, a number of changes have been made to Ordinance 1920. She moved that the hearing on the proposed ordinances not be held this evening. The Hearing should be re-advertised for April 14, 2005, and that the proposed ordinances are re-submitted to the Township and the MCPC, and the proposed Ordinance 1920 is presented this evening for discussion only, seconded by Commissioner DiJoseph.

 

Commissioner Carlin asked is there a timetable with the MCPC?

 

Mr. Penecale replied they have 30-days from the date of submission.

 

Commissioner Carlin asked when will it be submitted?

 

Mr. Penecale replied tomorrow providing there are no other amendments. In March, 2004 a plan was forwarded to the MCPC on behalf of the Susquehanna Investment Company for the proposed development of 84 new single-family dwellings and one existing dwelling for a total of 85 on the property known as Rydal Waters. In a letter dated May 7, 2004 the MCPC commented that the Township should take greater care in the development of this site such as a better circulation, layout of the dwellings, the preservation of open space, and the existing natural resources on the site. In addition, the MCPC identified several other areas of concern such as a secondary means of  ingress/egress to the site, the impact to Brook and Huntingdon Roads, and the overall appearance of the development.

 

In June, 2004 a meeting was held between the MCPC and the applicant to discuss their comments. The MCPC offered to develop a series of alternative plans that the developer could bring back to the Township for review.

 

In August, 2004 that series of alternative designs were presented to the applicant. The Township was not involved in that meeting. Present at that meeting were members of the MCPC and several members of the applicant’s design team. The Township was told the meeting was productive and ended with the applicant’s promise to explore one of the alternative development plans. During that time, the Township was involved in meetings with the residents of Brook and Huntingdon Roads and members of the applicant’s design team. The purpose was to discuss the concerns of the immediate residents. Those issues

 

 

Board of Commissioners Meeting                                                         March 10, 2005

 

 

were access to the site, the use of Brook Road , some additional buffering, and the required open space and where it would be located.   

 

On September 9, 2004, the Board of Commissioners granted preliminary plan approval to the applicant for the development of 85 new single family homes with two conditions: 1. The final plan will incorporate the MCPC’s comments. 2. The Township entertains a motion to rezone the property to allow for one of the two alternative plans to be developed. The recommendation from staff also included that the applicant gain direct access to Old York Road, limit the access to Brook Road, provide the secondary means of ingress/egress for the fire companies, and some form of overflow parking.

 

In October, 2004 we entered into a draft of Ordinances 1920 and 1921. They were forwarded to the MCPC in November, 2004. In January, 2005 the MCPC issued a staff review letter on the proposed drafts of the two new ordinances. Their concerns were the naming of the district as the R-5, the Township failed to put in any density limitation language, and that the Township look at the open space requirement and the buffering language and increase it. They recommended that the drafts of Ordinances 1920 and 1921 be approved providing their issues were addressed. We have worked on revising Ordinances 1920 and 1921 to address the MCPC’s concerns and the concerns of the residents of Brook and Huntingdon Roads.

 

He presented a power point presentation on the proposed zoning change of the Neighborhood Residential District (NR), and copies were given to the Board.

 

Commissioner O’Connor referred to Ordinance 1920, Section 305.1 – Purpose – “The purpose and intent of the NR Neighborhood Residential District is to provide locations for medium density single family detached residential land use in areas of the Township which have been previously zoned in total or in part for higher density residential or higher density non-residential uses.” Would a Community Service District apply?

 

Mr. Penecale replied a Community Service District does not allow residential uses as a use by right. A CS District allows for uses such as hospitals, churches, etc.

 

Commissioner O’Connor asked are hospitals considered high density?

 

Mr. Penecale replied no, because the density calculation refers to residential development not commercial development.

 

Commissioner O’Connor asked if someone wants to change their community service zoned parcel to NR, would it be allowed?

 

Board of Commissioners Meeting                                                         March 10, 2005

 

 

Mr. Penecale replied they would have to go through a rezoning of the parcel and a map amendment. Any property can be rezoned.

 

Commissioner Agostine stated we have many zoning districts and anyone can request a zoning change for their parcel, but it is at the sole discretion of this Board.

 

Commissioner Carlin asked for clarification on why the Village Residential ordinance mentioned six wards and six different locations.

 

Commissioner Agostine replied when we gave preliminary approval to the plan, we knew based on the conditions, we had to do some rezoning. At the time we considered rezoning the entire parcel AO or do something else. She sent a memo to the Board of Commissioners asking for their input on creating an AO 2 District that would be less intense. She never received a response so she focused on getting a better plan for the Rydal Waters development.

 

Commissioner Carlin stated the “Purpose Section” states, “The purpose and intent of the NR Neighborhood Residential District is to provide locations for medium density single family detached residential land use in areas in the Township which have been previously zoned – in total or in part – for higher density residential or higher density non-residential uses.” Does this overlay any other districts?

 

Mr. Penecale replied it is not an overlay.

 

Commissioner Carlin asked is this the only parcel that meets the “Purpose Section” definition?

 

Mr. Penecale replied it is the only parcel that we wish to apply it to.

 

Commissioner Carlin asked does this ordinance conform to our Comprehensive Plan?

 

Mr. Penecale replied yes. The Comprehensive Plan says there is a limited amount of property available for development. We should be careful on how we develop it. He feels that is what we are doing.

 

Commissioner Agostine read a statement from Commissioner Weilheimer regarding this ordinance in her absence. “In response to inquiries by some of her fellow Commissioners regarding the NR Ordinance proposal, please be advised that I am comfortable that the language used in this ordinance will not enable it to affect the large properties that currently exist in Ward 1.” The definition for the arterial highway was the request of Commissioner Weilheimer.

 

 

Board of Commissioners Meeting                                                         March 10, 2005

 

 

Commissioner Gross stated the revised version of Ordinance 1920 will be reviewed by the MCPC and the Abington Township Planning Commission. We will then have a public hearing on April 14, 2005 to discuss their comments.

 

Commissioner Turco asked would a club house on this site take up too much property?

 

Mr. Penecale replied no, the coverage percentage stays the same.

 

Commissioner O’Connor stated there are two or three parcels in Ward 3 that this ordinance could apply to. If this ordinance is designed specifically for this parcel, isn’t that spot zoning?

 

Commissioner Agostine replied no, because it does not incur rights to the developer that he doesn’t currently have.

 

Mr. Conway stated “spot zoning” in terms of an illegal concept is where we would change the zoning to benefit the property owner. In this particular case, it is not spot zoning because as a result of this rezoning there is no benefit that accrues to the property owner. The benefit is for the Township and the neighbors.

 

Commissioner Agostine stated Mr. Matteo, Solicitor Herder, and she had many meetings with her residents. When they saw there was no buffer between their property line and the new homes they were upset. They wanted the houses moved, and we explained it is not possible except with a zoning change. They asked for a zoning change and she explained the Board does not entertain a zoning change lightly.

 

Commissioner Lynott stated he has a lot of respect for the hard work and ingenuity that Commissioner Agostine and staff have put into this project. He feels 84 homes on this property will be a black eye for the Township. He has tried to find a legal definition for “spot zoning.” We are proposing that Abington Township ’s zoning ordinance be amended to expedite the development of  a single piece of property, and that is the sole purpose for creating this amendment. That seems to be a legal precedent.

 

Mr. Penecale stated this is a longer more drawn out process. The alternative would be to go the ZHB and attempt to obtain a variance. Staff felt it was better to present this to the Board of Commissioners than to take an application of this nature to the ZHB for a variance to relocate the open space and change the setbacks. We have discussed spot zoning on many occasions with Solicitor Herder. If we give the applicant rights to development that ground that he did not have now, that is spot zoning.

 

Commissioner Lynott stated maybe there is some sort of legal precedent for amending a zoning ordinance aimed at expediting a single development.

 

 

Board of Commissioners Meeting                                                         March 10, 2005

 

 

Commissioner Gross stated we are voting to re-advertise this ordinance this evening so the MCPC and the Abington Township Planning Commission can review it again.

 

Stan Brubaker, 942 Brown Avenue , asked to be heard on this matter.

 

Commissioner Agostine stated this is out of order. We have an ordinance to consider re-advertising, and we will have a public hearing next month. He can go before the Abington Township Planning Commission meeting and offer his comments, and if they feel it should be presented to the Board; we will discuss it then.

 

Commissioner Turco stated Mr. Brubaker may comment on the re-advertising of this ordinance.

 

Mr. Burbaker stated his suggestions may help expedite this process. He suggested revising the language to state, “That this proposed ordinance will be applied to this particular piece of property noted as Rydal Waters” rather than “applying to such parcel or parcels where the elimination of non-residential uses is appropriate.” That gives the implication that this ordinance will be applied to other properties. What is the harm of changing the minimum lot requirements to 7,500 sq. ft?

 

Commissioner Agostine stated she posed that question to our Planning Consultant, Mr. Rieker, and he said it was inappropriate to put that language in the ordinance. The way to define it is with the map amendment. If we were to change the minimum lot requirements to 7,500 sq. ft. then it would render it useless for the Rydal Waters development because this developer has preliminary plan approval, and according to the MPC Section 508.4.I: “The preliminary plan approval vests the developer to do everything that is in that plan.”

 

MOTION to re-advertise Ordinances 1920 and 1921 for a public hearing to be held on April 14, 2005 passed 14-0.

 

 

Subdivision/Land Development Plan LS-05-02 – Dratax Montgomery

Inc. – 1908 Roberts Road

 

Commissioner Agostine made a MOTION, seconded by Commissioner DiJoseph to approve the subdivision and land development plan of Dratax Montgomery, Inc., as prepared by John H. Leapson, Registered Professional Engineer, dated December 21, 2004. The applicant proposes to subdivide the existing 10.91 acres into 10 lots. Each lot will contain a new single-family dwelling. The lots range in size from 0.69 acres to 1.29 acres in lot area. The applicant proposes a new cul-de-sac street known as Laurel Hill Lane . The applicant proposes the installation of streetlights, street trees, fire protection emergency access road and a fully compliant storm water management system. The

Board of Commissioners Meeting                                                         March 10, 2005

 

 

property is located at 1908 Roberts Road , zoned in the (R-1) Residential District in Ward No. 1 of the Township of Abington .

 

This motion is subject to the following conditions:

 

1.      The applicant will be required to install two fire hydrants on the proposed new

street. The water supply for the new fire hydrants will be required to be looped from Roberts Road to Deer Run Road .

 

2.      The fire access lane will connect the proposed new street and Deer Run Road .

Additionally, this access lane will be installed as conditioned by the Zoning Hearing Board decision. (As requested by Fire Marshal Ken Clark, the design for the emergency access road to the above referenced subdivision shall conform to the Township Engineer’s specification:

 

a.      The shape of the access road will be in the form of a “V” at a cross       

      slope of a ¼” per foot.

 

This motion is subject to the following waivers:

 

  1. Waiver from Section 146-11(A) – Property Identification Plan.
  2. Waiver from Section 146-11(B) – Existing Features Plan.
  3. Waiver from Section 146-24.4 – Right-of-way and paving width.
  4. Waiver from Section 146-27 – Sidewalks.
  5. Waiver from Section 146-38 – Street Lighting Fixtures.
  6. Waiver from Section 146—39 – Length of Cul-de-sac.
  7. Waiver from Section 146-39 – Shade Trees – The applicant has requested a waiver from the requirement of the Ordinance to plant shade trees along the frontages of the proposed new lots. Three shade trees will be required to be planted on each lot.

 

Commissioner Agostine read a statement from Commissioner Weilheimer into the record. “I will not be present at tonight’s Board of Commissioners meeting as I am away on a previously scheduled family vacation. Although there is no mechanism to allow me to vote via proxy, I would appreciate the Board taking my views into consideration when voting upon the land development plan for the Kol Ami property.

 

As I mentioned at the Code Enforcement meeting, I have met with all of the interested adjoining neighbors to the Kol Ami property and the interested neighbors fully support and had input into the Dratch plan, which is presented tonight.

 

The wrinkle in the plan’s approval related to the practicability in creating the emergency access road mandated by the Fire Marshal. It is my understanding that a revised

 

Board of Commissioners Meeting                                                         March 10, 2005

 

 

emergency access plan has been submitted and approved by Mike Powers, Larry Matteo, and Ken Clark. Provided you are satisfied that the condition of an emergency access road

will be met, I ask you to approve this plan presented by the Dratch group for the Kol Ami property as it is what the residents’ desire.” 

 

Commissioner Carlin asked for an update on the fire access road.

 

Commissioner Turco stated at the Code Enforcement Committee meeting this plan was to be sent to the full Board without a recommendation. Why is there a motion to approve this evening?

 

Commissioner Ring replied any member can make a motion and then discuss whether that condition was met.

 

 Commissioner Turco stated we were supposed to receive this in our packet before tonight’s meeting.

 

Mr. Conway stated the committee’s direction was that the issue of the access road be worked out, and it has been done.

 

Mr. Matteo stated on March 7, 2005, the new plan came in showing the grade changes to accommodate any emergency vehicle. Mr. Powers reviewed this plan along with Ken Clark, and our Code Enforcement staff.

 

Commissioner Turco stated we are going to vote on it without having a chance to look at it.

 

Mr. Matteo stated the new plan shows the re-grading of the fire access road from a 19% slope to 13.7% to accommodate emergency vehicles.

 

Commissioner Zappone asked is the Township responsible for maintaining the Belgium block curbing along the roadway?

 

Mr. Powers replied the homeowner is responsible not the Township.

 

Commissioner Zappone asked if our plow truck hits and damages the Belgium block curbing, who will replace it?

 

Mr. Powers replied the homeowner.

 

Commissioner Zappone asked have all of the resident’s concerns been addressed?

 

Board of Commissioners Meeting                                                         March 10, 2005

 

 

Mr. Matteo replied yes.

 

Commissioner Agostine commented it is clearly stated in Commissioner Weilheimer’s statement.

 

Commissioner Carlin commented he would like to have seen a Synagogue, and he suggested reviewing the Shade Tree Ordinance to see whether it is up-to-date.

 

Commissioner Agostine stated shade trees are required to be planted as listed in waiver number seven.

 

MOTION was ADOPTED 13-1. Commissioner Zappone opposed.

 

PUBLIC SAFETY COMMITTEE:

 

Second Alarmer’s Lease Agreement

 

Commissioner Myers made a MOTION, seconded by Commissioner McGrath to authorize Lease Agreement with Second Alarmer’s for use of property at 876 Jenkintown Road ; and extension of Service Agreement to 2025 contingent upon completion of new facility.

 

MOTION was ADOPTED 14-0.

 

PAL Grant

 

Commissioner Myers made a MOTION, seconded by Commissioner McGrath to authorize Township officials to accept a grant award from Abington Police Athletic/Activities League in the amount of $10,000.00

 

MOTION was ADOPTED 14-0.

 

Sobriety Checkpoint Grant (410)

 

Commissioner Myers made a MOTION, seconded by Commissioner McGrath to authorize Township officials to accept a grant match from Citizens and Police Together in the amount of $300.00.

 

Sobriety Checkpoint Grant (ID-04-08-1)

 

Commissioner Myers made a MOTION, seconded by Commissioner McGrath to authorize Township officials to accept a grant match from Citizens and Police Together in the amount of $100.00.

 

Board of Commissioners Meeting                                                         March 10, 2005

 

 

MOTION was ADOPTED 14-0.

 

PUBLIC AFFAIRS COMMITTEE:

 

Montgomery County Municipal Transit Grant Program

 

Commissioner Carlin made a MOTION, seconded by Commissioner Lynott to accept the grant appropriation of $13,295.00 from the Montgomery County Municipal Transit Grant Program calendar year 2005.

 

MOTION was ADOPTED 14-0.

 

Settlement Music School Lease Extension

 

 Commissioner Carlin made a MOTION, seconded by Lynott to approve an extension of the Settlement Music School Lease for two years, beginning September 1, 2006 and ending September 1, 2008; at which time, the lease will revert to a year-to-year agreement.

 

MOTION was ADOPTED 14-0.

 

Penbryn Pool Resurfacing

 

Commissioner Carlin made a MOTION, seconded by Commissioner Lynott to reject bids from both Allstate Technology and Stoneridge for the Resurfacing of Penbryn Pool.

 

MOTION was ADOPTED 14-0.

 

Mowing Contract – 2005, 2006, and 2007

 

Commissioner Carlin made a MOTION, seconded by Commissioner Lynott to accept the lowest responsible bids of:

 

M & M Landscaping                            Zone 1             $21,000

 

Louis Biase                                           Zone 2             $14,700

                                                            Zone 3             $15,700

                                                            Zone 4             $13,400

                                                            Total               $64,800                      

 

MOTION was ADOPTED 14-0.

 

Board of Commissioners Meeting                                                         March 10, 2005

 

 

Hillside Condemnation – Engineering Contract

 

Commissioner Carlin made a MOTION, seconded by Commissioner Lynott to authorize an expenditure not to exceed $9,000 from Contingency Account #01-01-002-5299 for additional services rendered by Vollmer & Associates relating to the Hillside litigation.

 

MOTION was ADOPTED 14-0.

 

FINANCE COMMITTEE:

 

Treasurer’s Report:

 

There was no report at this time.

 

Investments

 

Commissioner Luker made a MOTION, seconded by Commissioner Carlin to approve the investments for the month of January, 2005 as previously circulated to the Board. It was noted that investments for the month totaled $875,000. Interest yields ranged from 3.17% to 5.058%.

 

MOTION was ADOPTED 14-0.

 

Expenditures/Salaries and Wages

 

Motion to:

 

(A)   Approve the January expenditures as previously circulated to the Board, in the amount of $1,632,600.76 and salaries and wages in the amount of $1,624,157.90.

(B)   Authorize the proper officials to sign vouchers in payment of bills and contracts as they mature for the month of April, 2005.

 

Roll Call resulted in motion being passed 14-0.

 

Training and Conference Expenses

 

Commissioner Luker made a MOTION, seconded by Commissioner Carlin to approve the Advance and Travel Expense activity for January, 2005 as previously circulated to the Board. There was no activity for the month of January 2005.

 

MOTION was ADOPTED 14-0.

 

 

Board of Commissioners Meeting                                                         March 10, 2005

 

 

Clearing Fund/Deferred Revenue and Expense/Petty Cash

 

Commissioner Luker made a MOTION, seconded by Commissioner Carlin to approve the Clearing Fund, deferred revenue/expense activity and petty cash balances for the month of January, 2005 as previously circulated to the Board.

 

Petty Cash balances were approved as per Finance Committee Report.

 

Clearing Fund receipts and disbursements for the month of January, 2005 were $12,524.33 and ($0.87), respectively.

 

Deferred Revenue/Expense receipts and disbursements for the month of January 2005 were $2,900.00 and ($0.00), respectively.

 

MOTION was ADOPTED 14-0.

 

Recommendation of Underwriter of 2005 General Obligation Bond Issue

 

Commissioner Luker made a MOTION, seconded by Commissioner Carlin to ratify decision of Finance Committee for proper Township officials to enter into agreement with PNC Capital Markets to act as underwriter in the 2005 General Obligation Bond Issue.

 

MOTION was ADOPTED 14-0.

 

Recommendation of Paying Agent for 2005 General Obligation Bond Issue

 

Commissioner Luker made a MOTION, seconded by Commissioner Carlin to authorize proper Township officials to enter into agreement with J.P. Morgan Chase Bank, N.A. to act as paying agents for the 2005 General Obligation Bond Issue.

 

MOTION was ADOPTED 14-0.

 

Resolution No. 05-004 – Authorizing H.A. Berkheimer Tax Administrators to Impose and Retain Costs of Collection on Delinquent Earned Income Taxes

 

Commissioner Luker made a MOTION, seconded by Commissioner Carlin to approve Resolution No. 05-004 delineating a schedule of delinquent tax collection costs.

 

MOTION was ADOPTED 14-0.

 

 

 

 

Resolution 05-004

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Board of Commissioners Meeting                                                         March 10, 2005

 

 

Ken Krawchuk, 117 West Avenue , referred to Resolution #05-004, “ Abington Township has the right to impose a cost of collection on taxes.” That is true however; it does not give the Township the right to delegate that power. If the cost is imposed by Berkheimer, what does that have to do with the Township? It says, “Berkheimer is authorized to retain that cost.” If it is imposed by Berkheimer, why do they need the Township’s permission to retain it? How can you vote on this with so much contradiction?

 

Commissioner Wachter replied Berkheimer does not retain the funds; they retain the cost of collection of the funds.

 

Commissioner Carlin asked Mr. Krawchuk if he thinks the Township has the authority to tax.

 

Mr. Krawchuk replied according to the Pennsylvania Constitution he does not think so.

 

Ms. Matiza stated the Township has the right to hire a tax collector for the collection of our earned income taxes, and we also have the right to hire them to collect our delinquent taxes. The resolution refers to delinquent tax payers.

 

Mr. Krawchuck stated this resolution does not make sense, and he suggested tabling it until it is written better.

 

Commissioner Gross stated he will direct our Solicitor to speak to Mr. Krawchuk on this matter.

 

REMARKS OF COMMISSIONERS:

 

Commissioner Gillespie wished everyone a “Happy St. Patrick’s Day.”

 

Commissioner O’Connor announced that on February 28, 2005, Ruth Plato passed away. She was President of the Ward 3 Townwatch for the past 10 years, and she will be missed.

 

Commissioner Agostine thanked the Code Enforcement staff for their hard work on Ordinance 1920, and she appreciates their time and efforts.

 

Commissioner Myers stated last Friday morning she saw Chief Kelly on television, and heard about the stunning capture of two homicide suspects. She congratulated Chief Kelly and our Police Department on their incredible capture and a job well done.

 

 

 

 

Board of Commissioners Meeting                                                         March 10, 2005

 

 

Commissioner Wachter commented he appreciates what the police did for us, and asked that the Public Safety Committee consider raising the accident report fee to $25.

 

Commissioner DiJoseph thanked the Highway Department for an outstanding job with snow removal.

 

Commissioner Gross commended the staff on the fine work that they do for this Township.

 

 

ADJOURNMENT:                           9:25 p.m.

 

 

Respectfully submitted,

 

 

 

Burton T. Conway, Secretary

 

sev

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 


Home
     
Copyright © 2003 Abington Township. All Rights Reserved.